Stephen argues for economic benefits of £20 Universal Credit lifeline

At Treasury Questions on Tuesday 20th October, Stephen asked Chief Secretary to the Treasury Steve Barclay about the £20 uplift to Universal Credit and its broader economic benefits.

The uplift is currently due to end in April but a broad coalition of charities and MPs are campaigning for it to be extended. A briefing this week from Joseph Rowntree Foundation outlined the broader economic benefits of social security increases.

Stephen said: "Social security is an effective tool to stimulate the economy. Much of the spend on the policy feeds through into an increase in economic activity. To support recovery, the economic case is clear: make the £20 a week uplift to Universal Credit and Working Tax Credit permanent."

Stephen endorses Recorder's "Shop Local" campaign

Stephen has called on people to shop locally this Christmas to support businesses in Newham.

A number of East Ham businesses fear the pandemic will force them to close. The Newham Recorder recently sent a questionnaire to all local businesses. Of all that responded, all but one expected takings to be down this Christmas. The Recorder has launched its ‘Shop Local’ campaign to support local high streets.

Speaking about the campaign, Stephen said: “This has been a tough year in Newham and for many it has been very tough indeed. There has been a massive community response, supporting families in the greatest difficulty. Local businesses have played their part and I hope we will all be supporting Newham’s independent businesses in the run-up to Christmas.”

Stephen backs physical proof of status under EU Settlement Scheme

In consideration of the Lords amendments on the Immigration and Social Security Bill on 19 October, Stephen spoke in favour of amendment 5, which would require the Secretary of State to offer a physical document free of charge to any EEA citizen who applies for leave or has been granted leave under the EU settlement scheme.

Stephen raised the concerns of London First, that without physical proof legitimate migrants will struggle to prove their status in a context where employers, landlords and banks are required to perform immigration checks. Stephen also highlighted concerns from the Roma Support Group that many of those they support lack full digital access or literacy.

The EU settlement scheme statistics show that Newham had a total of 91,000 applications submitted—the biggest number of any local authority.

The amendment did not pass, with 260 for and 331 against. Stephen’s full speech can be read here.

MPs call for starter payments to provide financial support during wait for first Universal Credit payment

The Work and Pensions Select Committee - which Stephen Chairs - is calling on Ministers to make a “starter payment” to people claiming Universal Credit (UC) for the first time. This would ensure that everyone has enough money for basics such as food and heating during the wait for their initial monthly payment, Committee says.

The Committee warns that this leaves people with a difficult choice: five weeks with no income, or the risk of debt and hardship later. The report concludes that the introduction of a new payment - equivalent to three weeks of the standard allowance - would be a simple way of ensuring that new claimants had the money they needed for basic living essentials. For people moving from existing benefits, DWP should make the move seamless wherever possible - and pay a starter payment in other cases.

Advances should still be available for people who need further support to get by, but they should be renamed 'new claim loans' to make clear that they will need to be repaid. The DWP should also recognise that a request for a loan is a clear indication that someone is struggling and offer support as early as possible.

Reflecting evidence from Sir Iain Duncan Smith, among others, the Committee has also called for changes to the way that historic tax credit is clawed back from people when they move to Universal Credit—and for DWP's debt collection to follow best practice in the private sector.

In addition, the Committee calls on the Government to make permanent the £20 per week increase in the standard UC allowance announced in response to the coronavirus pandemic.

Speaking about the report, Stephen said: “There is a growing body of evidence that moving to Universal Credit leaves many reliant on food banks, falling seriously behind with their rent, and even experiencing increased levels of psychological distress. The Government's response is that there is no proof that Universal Credit—and in particular the wait for a first payment—is the direct cause of those difficulties. So DWP needs to commission research, and quickly, to find out what lies behind these deeply worrying findings. Our social security system should not be leaving people without the money they need for food and heating.

In the meantime, the Government must face up to the fact that its current system of Advance loans simply isn't working. They leave people facing the toughest of choices: go without income for at least five weeks, or have repayments subtracted from their future UC payments—which are already barely enough to get by on.

We cannot understand why people who are already claiming benefits need to wait for at least five weeks when they move to Universal Credit—especially when nothing in their lives has changed. Their move should be seamless.

For people claiming benefits for the first time, or people who've faced a significant change in their circumstances, the Government should provide starter payments. Doing so would both cut down on the need for Advance loans and ensure that nobody is forced into debt just to be able to afford to eat and keep a roof over their heads.

UC is a highly automated system. That has been a real strength over the last few months, with the huge influx of new claims caused by the coronavirus pandemic. But it can also be a major weakness, leaving people without the tailored support they need, and Ministers unable to make the changes they want to see. There is much the Government can do without completely dismantling the UC system: we hope that our proposals, taken together, offer practical solutions for making Universal Credit work for everyone who needs it."

Stephen leads MPs in debate on No Recourse to Public Funds

In a Westminster Hall debate on Wednesday 8 October, Stephen Timms and other Members of Parliament questioned Minister Chris Philp about the No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) policy.

Members told heartbreaking stories of the the hardship the No Recourse to Public Funds condition is causing to families in their constituencies, particularly during the pandemic.

The condition, which applies to most migrants granted limited leave in the UK, prevents people from accessing most benefits like Universal Credit or child benefit. Over the coronavirus pandemic, this has left people who have lost hours or income or who are otherwise ineligble for the governement’s support schemes, without a safety net. Data from the Home Office has showed that the number of migrants subject to NRPF applying for destitution support increased six-fold in the first three months of lockdown.

Minister Chris Philp promised to probe whether change of conditions applications could be decided more speedily, see if he could find out data on the number of in-country visa applications, and clarify if people with NRPF would be eligible for the £500 Track and Trace Support payment.

Stephen said: “I hope the Minister will now provide me with answers to straightforward questions on data on no Recourse to Public Funds. And once he has finally acknowledged the scale of this issue, he must suspend the condition until this pandemic is over. It is causing families enormous hardship.”

Stephen presses Prime Minister about Universal Credit uplift

At Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday 7 October, Stephen asked Prime Minister Boris Johnson about the £20 a week uplift in Universal Credit.

The uplift, introduced as part of the package of measures to support people during the coronavirus pandemic, is currently set to end in April, despite there being no end in sight for the pandemic. A coalition of 50 organisations including the Joseph Rowntree Foundation recently called on the Chancellor to continue this uplift.

Stephen urges more decisive action by UK government on annexation of Palestinian territories

In a Backbench Business debate on the Palestinian territories on Friday 23 September, Stephen urged the UK to take more decisive action about illegal settlement building and potential annexation

Although immediate plans for annexation are currently suspended, they might still take place.

Stephen said: "I welcome the stand that the Government have taken against annexation, but simply stating that we do not approve of it is not enough.”

Stephen raises deep concerns with Overseas Operations Bill

In a debate on the Overseas Operations Bill on Wednesday 23 September, Stephen expressed deep concern that torture was not excluded in the remit of the Bill, which aims to introduce a presumption against prosecution for British soldiers serving abroad.

Stephen is the Chair for the APPG for Extraordinary Rendition, which aims to stop governments ever again participating in rendition leading to torture.

Stephen said: “Torture offences must be excluded from the Overseas Operations Bill, as Ministers initially suggested, along with sexual offences which have already been excluded.”

The bill passed at second reading by 332 to 77. Labour abstained but will aim to amend the bill at committee stage to reflect such concerns.

Stephen joins international students to demand justice

(Victoria Jones/PA)

Stephen has joined students who were wrongly accused of cheating in their English Language Tests in delivering a letter to Boris Johnson. The students represent thousands of others who have been fighting for six years to prove their innocence.

The 200 students are some of about 34,000 accused by the Home Office of cheating in the English language tests they needed to pass in order to secure their visas. More than 1,000 students have been removed from the UK as a result of the accusation, and many were arrested and detained by immigration enforcement officers, but large numbers say they were wrongly accused.

Undercover filming by the BBC six years ago revealed cheating in two Home Office approved test centres, but campaigners say the Home Office was wrong to conclude that the vast majority of students who took the test in dozens of other centres all over the country had also cheated.

Acting on evidence from the private company that provided the tests, the Home Office concluded that 34,000 of the 58,458 students who had taken the test between 2011 and 2014 had definitely cheated, that a further 22,600 had “questionable results”, and that only 2,000 had definitely not cheated. Campaigners have questioned whether it is plausible that such a large proportion of students sitting a Home Office-approved test could have cheated.

After delivering the letter to Downing Street, Stephen said that it was “implausible” that more than 90% of those who took the Home Office test were involved in cheating. “It’s since become quite clear that many of those students probably most of them, were completely innocent of the charge that was made against them,” he said. “They have been in limbo in the five or six years ever since, they’re not allowed to study, they’re not allowed to work. Their money has gone, often their family’s life savings were invested in getting them a decent British education that’s been completely lost. I am appalled by the terrible hardship that has been inflicted on them by a false allegation that the British government simply accepted.”

Stephen speaks at launch of Shpresa report

Earlier this week, Stephen spoke at the launch of the one year evaluation of Breaking the Chains – a partnership project by Newham-based charity Shpresa and the Migrant and Refugee Children’s Legal Unit (MiCLU).

Life for those seeking asylum in this country is difficult. But, since the outbreak of Covid-19, navigating the hostile environment has never been more challenging. Breaking the Chains aims to improve the legal representation available to Albanian speaking young people seeking asylum. It also seeks to amplify their voices as they share the difficulties they face here in the UK.

At the evaluation launch, the young people supported by Shpresa and MiCLU shared their experiences through artwork, spoken word and poetry. In one poem, Shpresa was referred to as “a refuge where we can just be young people.” Their stories communicated in a powerful way that the young people supported by Shpresa and MiCLU are desperate to live fulfilling lives in the UK. However, they are currently stuck at home, with nothing to do but wait for the Home Office to decide their future.

There were also contributions from academics and lawyers. They reported that, since Breaking the Chains began in March 2019, the project has made considerable progress in providing Albanian asylum seekers with the legal advice they need. It was found that Albanian young people in particular have trouble seeking refuge in the UK. For example, in 2016, out of the 229 applicants, only two were recognised as refugees. However, there has been an improvement in the past year with a 9% success rate of young Albanians seeking asylum. There is no denying this improvement occurred alongside the work of Breaking the Chains.

Speaking at the event, Stephen said: “I am grateful to the young people for sharing their honest experiences – in excellent English – and explaining the struggles of the legal system.

I continue to champion Shpresa and MiCLU in their efforts to support and empower vulnerable asylum seekers consistently throughout and prior to the pandemic.

It is vital that the Government takes urgent action to live up to its moral and legal obligations to asylum seekers. It cannot continue to remain complacent on this issue and must put an immediate end to systematic discrimination of Albanian children and young people in the asylum system.”

Stephen supports action to protect low-income families

Stephen has joined experts and frontline practitioners from the charity, Action for Children, to launch a report revealing how many families have found themselves struggling virtually overnight during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Action for Children’s latest research uncovers how the pandemic has worsened household finances for many families. Through their Coronavirus Emergency Fund, the charity has supported over 10,000 children and young people living in more than 4,800 families around the UK during the outbreak, spending over £500,000 on essentials such as food, domestic bills and educational resources.

Over a third of households seeking support from the charity’s Emergency Fund have experienced financial pressures as a result of the increased costs associated with having had the whole family at home full-time, while two-fifths had to ask for help to afford food.

Stephen heard from key workers on the frontline about their experiences of helping children, young people and families throughout the pandemic, and pledged to support Action for Children’s efforts to ensure low-income families with children are protected from the financial impacts of coronavirus.

Speaking afterwards, Stephen said: “The impact that the coronavirus outbreak has had on low-income families with children is a huge concern, and one that will be amplified by winter and the prospect of a second wave.

“I am grateful for the support offered by charities like Action for Children, helping many families with the basics throughout the crisis and preventing children from being scarred by the pandemic.

“But it is clear that we need to do more to improve the financial assistance available to families facing difficulties, both now and in the longer-term, and I support action to make sure that help is available where it is needed.”

Stephen discusses options for preventing a second wave of unemployment

Earlier today, Stephen joined the Learning and Work Institute to discuss the end of the furlough scheme.

ONS employment data for July, indicates that three million workers were still receiving support from the Job Retention Scheme. Despite the headline figures for unemployment not altering dramatically, there are clear indicators that once the furlough scheme ends, unemployment could rise significantly.

In his contribution, Stephen highlighted the immediate need for the Chancellor to address this large economic challenge. Although supportive of the Kickstart Scheme, Stephen called on Minsiters to do more by ensuring there are “opportunity guarantees” for young people.

Speaking about the government’s response, Stephen said “It takes months for schemes to get into their stride once they are launched. We need an order of magnitude step-up from what [schemes have] come before and we need them to be established soon.”

The Learning and Work Institute Report “When furlough has to stop – next steps to avert long-term unemployment” can be found here.

Stephen asks about Universal Credit and foodbank demand following National Audit Office recommendations

At the Department for Work and Pensions Questions on Monday 14 September, Stephen Timms questioned Minister for Welfare Delivery, Will Quince, about Universal Credit and foodbank demand.

The question came after the National Audit Office told the Work and Pensions Select Committee that the "sophisticated analysis" of the Trussell Trust has "established an association" between the roll-out of Universal Credit and rising foodbank demand.

Stephen said afterwards: ‘I hope now that the Government will commission research, as the National Audit Office has recommended, into the impact of universal credit on food bank demand.’

Stephen calls on PM to take responsibility for exams fiasco

Last week MPs debated the personal role and involvement of the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Education in the summer’s exams fiasco.

A motion was passed calling for the publication of all documents relating to the awarding of A level grades this year, following the cancellation of exams due to the pandemic. A-level students were initially awarded grades by Ofqual, which were calculated using an algorithm that took into account the past performance of individual schools. It was soon discovered that the system was deeply flawed and a credible appeals process had not been put in place. Ofqual have since admitted it was a “fundamental mistake” to release these grades and said tweaks to the algorithm would not have helped.

Stephen wrote to the Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, last month asking the Government to return to teacher assessment grades. He therefore welcomed the U-turn announced the following week. Students were subsequently allocated Centre Assessed Grades - 40% of which were higher. However, by this point many had lost their place at the University they had chosen. At the Opposition Day Debate, Kate Green, the shadow Education Secretary, said “It is a sign of the Prime Minister and Education Secretary’s serial incompetence that they are now running scared from transparency and scrutiny. Having failed young people and their families once with their shambolic handling of exams, they have now failed to be honest and transparent about their mistakes so that we can ensure they are not repeated.”

Speaking after the vote, Stephen said: “Whilst allocating results for exams which have not been sat was always going to be difficult, the Government had plenty of time to prepare for results day. The Prime Minister must take responsibility for the mistakes that were made and establish a clear plan to ensure A level students are not in this same position next year. No student should be worse off because of Government failure.”

Stephen calls for legal protections for tenants

Families in rented accommodation are still facing an uncertain future after it was announced that a ban on evictions will not be extended beyond the middle of the this month.

A nationwide ban was ban on evictions was introduced at the start of lockdown. It was due to end on 23 August, but the Government announced an extension two days before it came to an end.

This last-minute decision created turmoil for families who have had to twice prepare for upcoming evictions. Some will have taken out a loan to afford a deposit for a new tenancy, whilst others will have been forced to relocate to an entirely new area, uprooting their lives and leaving their support network behind.

The eviction ban will now be lifted on 20 September. Crucially, no protective legislation has been announced. The Opposition has called for legal changes to be brought forward to protect renters. These calls have been ignored and the Government Deputy Chief Whip has confirmed there will be no Parliamentary time next week for MPs to debate the evictions ban.

Thangam Debbonaire, the Shadow Housing Secretary, said “The Government’s chaotic handling of the evictions crisis has thrown renters and landlords into confusion. Labour has been saying for months that the Government needs a credible plan to prevent a dramatic rise in homelessness when the ban on evictions is lifted. As things stand, we are facing the same cliff edge next week that the Government narrowly avoided at the end of August.”

Back in March, the Housing Secretary, Robert Jenrick, said “…no renter who has lost income due to coronavirus will be forced out of their home.” However, Shelter now estimates that 230,000 renters are at risk of a Covid-19 eviction. 174,000 tenants have already been threatened with eviction by their landlord.

Stephen said “The Government must stick to their promise that no one would be forced out of their homes due to the pandemic. They must introduce urgent legal changes before the lifting of the eviction ban next week. Should they fail to do so, I am concerned that we will see increased levels of homelessness in East Ham and beyond.”

Stephen questions top Home Office official about 'TOEIC' English language tests

At a meeting of the Public Accounts Committee on Thursday, Stephen questioned Home Office Permanent Secretary Matthew Rycroft about the TOEIC English language testing scandal. It comes a year after the Public Accounts Committee first held a hearing on this matter following a National Audit Office report criticising the Home Office’s response.

Matthew Rycroft, the department’s permanent secretary, said he agreed that the Home Office should have taken a “more vigorous” approach to protecting those wrongly caught up in the process. But when asked by Stephen whether these individuals would have the opportunity to have their cases reviewed, Mr Rycroft said: “The Home Office decided not to set up a set of reviews like that, but as I’ve said there is a legal route open to anyone in that category.”

Stephen commented afterwards: “The English language test scandal is Windrush all over again.

"The permanent secretary appeared to agree with me that there should be a mechanism for innocent students to clear their names.  But the only route is through the courts.  The costs are immense.  Most students who have done it pay £10,000 to £15,000 – and they are not allowed to work.

"I welcome the Home Secretary’s commitment to implement all of the Windrush Lessons Learned recommendations. But the lessons are being ignored in handling the language testing scandal.  As in Windrush, there is a complete failure to engage beyond individual cases.

"Learning the lessons from Windrush would mean creating a mechanism for innocent students to clear their names.”

Stephen presses Minister on Kickstart scheme

Stephen asked about the government's newly launched ‘Kickstart’ employment scheme for young people in an Urgent Question in the Commons Chamber on Thursday 3rd September.

He asked about the role for charities in the scheme, how disabled young people will be helped to access the scheme, and about data collection to ensure robust evaluation.

Stephen said: 'Tory scrapping of the Future Jobs Fund in 2011 was a terrible blow to young people. In 2012, they published an evaluation proving it did a great job. I'm pleased its coming back (with a different name). This Government needs to make the most of it, as the Labour Government did.'

Stephen welcomes A-Level u-turn

Stephen has welcomed a u-turn by Education Secretary, Gavin Williamson, that A-level and GCSE students in East Ham will be given grades estimated by their teachers, rather than by an algorithm.

Headteachers across Newham, reported that over 40% of A-level results were downgraded by exams regulator Ofqual, which used a formula based on schools' prior grades.

Speaking about the u-turn, Stephen said “The Government has had months to sort out exams and has now been forced into a screeching U-turn after days of confusion. It has - in short - been a complete shambles.”

Stephen wrote to Gavin Williamson over the weekend urging him to allow pupils to use their centre assessed grades for GCSE and A-level results this year. The letter can be read here.

Data reveals exponential increase in migrant families with no access to welfare safety net forced into destitution

A new Home Office data release has revealed an exponential increase in applications to have the No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) condition lifted during the coronavirus pandemic.

In the second quarter of 2020 (from April to June) there were 5,665 applications to have the NRPF condition lifted, compared to 914 in the same period last year – an increase of 519.8%. The figure represents an 572% increase on the first quarter of 2020 (843 applications).

This increase reflects reports from charities and sector experts that thousands of No Recourse families are facing destitution during the coronavirus pandemic.

The data release also revealed that it took the Home Office an average of 30 days to decide on these applications – for which the requirement is destitution, imminent risk of destitution, or where there are particularly compelling reasons relating to the welfare of a child - in this period.

The proportion of people successful in their application – 89% - was the highest since records were made available in 2017, reflecting the high numbers in abject poverty.

The data was published after the Rt Hon. Stephen Timms MP raised concerns with the UK Statistics Authority about the lack of meaningful response from the Home Office to MPs’ Parliamentary Questions on the policy. In response, the UK Statistics Authority criticised the Home Office for giving “confusing and unclear” reasons for refusing to reveal how many migrants have the condition.

Daniel Shaw, the Home Office Head of Profession for Statistics for the Home Office recognised in his response that: ‘There is a clear public interest in NRPF with regards to the numbers of individuals where the policy has prevented access to public funds if this subsequently were to give rise to hardship.’

Rt Hon. Stephen Timms MP, Chair of the Work and Pensions Select Committee, commented: ‘This data puts into stark relief what we already know – that during the pandemic thousands of families without a safety net are being forced into destitution. This is an exceptional situation which demands an exceptional response. The NRPF condition must be lifted for the duration of the pandemic.’

During the pandemic, those with NRPF - which bars migrants from accessing ‘public funds’ – most mainstream benefits and welfare support - have faced particular hardship. Many are unable to access the Job Retention and Self Employment Schemes: they have been made redundant, have been working in the cash economy, or have significantly reduced hours or income. They are barred from accessing social security, so have no safety net. Many have been forced to disobey public health guidance in to obtain an income. Many are struggling to pay rent and bills, and are force to access foodbanks in order to provide for their families.

Stephen urges Ministers to reconsider its decision to suspend free travel for under-18s

Stephen has written to the Minister for Transport, Grant Shapps MP, to ask the Government to reconsider suspending free travel in London for under 18-year olds.

The public have been encouraged to find alternative methods to public transport due to Covid-19. Furthermore, social distancing rules have lowered the capacity of public transport by 15-20% of normal levels. Consequently, Transport for London’s finances have been forced into a precarious position. Fare income, the main source of its revenue, have fallen by 90% during lockdown.

On 14 May, it was announced that Transport for London and the Department for Transport have agreed a £1.6bn lockdown bailout. One of the conditions is to suspend the subsidy which provides free travel for under-18s. The cited reason for this decision is “demand management” due to the social distancing rules.

This policy will disproportionately impact poorer children. Given that over half of children in Newham are living in poverty, this will undoubtedly impact East Ham significantly. Stephen noted that “the Children’s Commissioner for England has already spoken of her fears that this could become “a lost generation” of children, yet the Government are pursuing policies which directly impact the poorest most. Although I understand the necessity for demand management, I believe that alternative policies can be implemented that won’t have a detrimental impact on the most vulnerable in our society. ”

Stephen’s letter calls on the Transport Secretary to examine different policies which could result in the reduced demand objective. You can read the letter here.